Premarket approval (PMA) is the regulatory pathway taken by Class III (high-risk) medical devices in the United States. It’s the most stringent regulatory pathway and requires substantial clinical data to support the safety and effectiveness claims made by a device’s manufacturer.
Given that clinical data is such a high priority for Class III medical devices, it’s important that clinical teams understand what will be required before, during, and after the PMA submission. So, in this article, we’ll break down the PMA requirements and some strategies for a successful PMA submission.
FDA defines Class III medical devices as those that:
You can find the full requirements for the premarket approval application in 21 CFR Part 814.20, but the key components include:
Particularly important for clinical teams are two additional sections known as the technical sections, which cover pre-clinical and clinical studies and must include:
The technical sections will make up a large portion of your PMA application, as these include the valid scientific evidence that will support your claim that the device is safe and effective. You must also include the results of all investigations, whether adverse or supportive of your application.
I cannot stress the importance of your clinical data (and non-clinical testing data) enough. Clinical and non-clinical investigations that are not carried out in accordance with the appropriate regulations are grounds for a denial of approval.
Given that clinical data plays such a large role in the approval or denial of your PMA application, it’s a good idea to look ahead and see what you can do to ensure that both your application and the clinical trials that precede it go smoothly. With that in mind, here are some strategies to ensure that your PMA submission ends in approval.
FDA explicitly states that they encourage applicants to contact them before submitting their PMA application in order to get a better understanding of the agency’s regulations, requirements, guidance documents, and processes.
Communicating early and often will facilitate the process for both sides and hopefully minimize any delays in what is already a lengthy process . There are a number of opportunities to get in touch with FDA both before and during the PMA process, and these are collectively known as the Q-Submission Program:
Your clinical data is the cornerstone of your PMA submission, potentially making or breaking your device’s approval. So it’s incredibly important to make sure that the studies which are generating your clinical data are airtight.
That means ensuring the study population is representative of the intended user population and clearly defining primary and secondary endpoints that will be clinically meaningful. It also means following Good Clinical Practice (GCP) throughout every aspect of your clinical studies, from design to adverse event reporting to data management practices.
One of the easiest ways to comply with GCP and FDA regulations around clinical data is to use an electronic data capture (EDC) solution that comes pre-validated to all of these requirements.
Attempting to do all of this with spreadsheets can lead to data errors and noncompliance with regulation like 21 CFR Part 11. And if data is not collected and managed according to FDA’s requirements, it won’t be accepted as the critical evidence you need during your PMA submission.
That’s why at Greenlight Guru, our EDC solution was built specifically for MedTech companies and comes pre-validated to ISO 14155:2020 and FDA regulatory requirements. You’ll also get 13 ready-to-use and customizable compliance document templates to ensure that your data is always collected and managed according to regulations.
It’s also a good idea to familiarize yourself with the various PMA supplements and amendments, including when you should use each of them
The PMA amendment process is particularly noteworthy here because PMA amendments are typically required when new data or analysis from a study needs to be reported to FDA. Major amendments can include:
Keep in mind, as part of the continuing approval of a PMA, manufacturers will also be required to submit annual post-approval reports starting one year from the date of approval. The reports will identify any changes (PMA supplements), as well as reports in scientific literature concerning the device and any unpublished data from clinical and non-clinical studies related to the device.
Clinical data is at the heart of the PMA process, and it’s incredibly important that you’re able to generate, collect, and manage high-quality data in a compliant manner. That’s why we built Greenlight Guru Clinical—to ensure MedTech companies have the solution they need to help bring life-changing medical devices to market.
With compliance built into the system, Greenlight Guru Clinical offers straightforward GCP-compliant reporting and customizable forms to fit the needs of any study. It also comes with flexible access and permissions, safeguarded data management for informed consent and electronic records, real-time event progress tracking, data export, and more.
Ready to learn more about how Greenlight Guru Clinical can help you collect and manage high-quality clinical data? Contact us today for your free personalized demo →.
Chris is a biomedical engineer and has been in the medical device space for about 13 years. He spent a number of years managing clinical studies for Class III devices in Pivotal studies, PMA studies, and post-market registries. He is currently working as a Solutions Engineer at Greenlight Guru where he showcases the...